HP ProBook 645 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 645 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1992
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180730
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 14:29
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5750M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 97.2
45% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 163
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
HP(103C 1992) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 6.4
4% 6.4 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 6.5
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AV0A1C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 88 99 106 105 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 122
Write 93.4
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 103
67% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 645 G1 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 645 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback