Lenovo 4174FM9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4174FM9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4174FM9
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit färger, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 08:56
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Memory 24.1
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 58
21% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 75.7
8-Core 85.2
10% 80.4 Pts
64-Core 96
6% 96 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21D3) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 0.5
0% 1.37 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 3.1
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 2%
Nvidia NVS 4200M
Legend(17AA 21D3) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 63 26 36 21 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 138
Write 97
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 43
21% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 6.6
26% 8.07 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 39.8
DQ Mixed 22.2
30% 58 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 9905469-154.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.5% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 292
14% 292 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 8.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4174FM9 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4174FM9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback