Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130111
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '17 at 19:45
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 148 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 441 44% 361 Pts	64-Core 441 27% 441 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% XFX(1682 3190) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	4.12% Terrible	Lighting 5.43 Reflection 5.77 Parallax 5.66 4% 5.62 fps	MRender 3.62 Gravity 5.17 Splatting 4.09 4% 4.29 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.12% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 1219 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 526 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 32 (A8) Unknown 100 100 126 (A9) Unknown 100 100 241 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 29 (AE) Unknown 100 100 64 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 39 167504576542 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 96 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3874 (F1) Unknown 253 253 2063 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2744 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	63.2% Good	Read 450 Write 283 Mixed 334 79% 356 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 14.4 89% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 65.8 DQ Mixed 45.6 35% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 384GB free Firmware: MS1O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 92 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896698553 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 942 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1890 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 841 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 944 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 944 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 176094511135 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	74% Very good	Read 124 Write 134 Mixed 110 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.16 85% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 103%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 500GB 583 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 343GB free, PID 01de Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 95.1 Write 99.6 Mixed 59.6 106% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.29 74% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 9,944 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.2% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 10.2 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16