Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3800 APU 1,505 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.9% Poor	Memory 32.7 1-Core 31.4 2-Core 35.8 22% 33.3 Pts	4-Core 73.5 8-Core 92.2 11% 82.8 Pts	64-Core 83.2 5% 83.2 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D 4,197 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Elitegroup(1019 7C26) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 4.2 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 4 Splatting 3 2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200619 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 122 133 129 101 69 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.6% Poor	Read 91.9 Write 142 Mixed 115 SusWrite 108 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 7.6 26% 8.67 MB/s	DQ Read 31.9 DQ Write 70.2 DQ Mixed 13.4 21% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown L46 03/2011 QBEX 10GB 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.54% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.83 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 1.2 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 239 17% 239 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	3x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	2x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	1x

SSD
120GB 120GBNetacBench 61%, 1,949 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	1x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	1x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $90

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16