ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P9X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140724
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '15 at 02:29
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 90.7 2-Core 176 61% 133 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 635 60% 495 Pts	64-Core 749 46% 749 Pts
Poor: 67% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450 15,395 User benchmarks, average bench 23% EVGA(3842 1582) 1.5GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5582 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Lighting 28.5 Reflection 44 Parallax 32.2 23% 34.9 fps	MRender 39.7 Gravity 22 Splatting 32.5 26% 31.4 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -108886009988439 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1051 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 985 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 985 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 265965 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 49 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 265965 (F2) Unknown 100 100 260475 (F9) Unknown 100 100 7314	60.2% Good	Read 501 Write 232 Mixed 294 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 9.73 73% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 7.48 37% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 95%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63 6,344 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 901GB free Firmware: MKAOA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 88 (03) Spinup time 124 124 51580306029 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6301 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 30 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15795 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3362 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6366 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6367 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 244813660198 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.8% Above average	Read 97.6 Write 104 Mixed 91 73% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.41 104% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 87%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60 7,916 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 0GB free Firmware: 3.ADG Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 83 195206650 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5265 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 54 601808359312 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19308 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4382 (BB) vendor-specific 83 83 17 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 43 707330090 (C2) HDA temperature 42 57 51539607594 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 73 58 176285528 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 269 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	21.7% Poor	Read 6.64 Write 69 Mixed 43 30% 39.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 0.82 4K Mixed 0.19 48% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 42%
Plugable USB3-SATA-U3 500GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 112GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 52.9 Write 37.8 Mixed 42.9 55% 44.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.11 28% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	656x
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	363x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	234x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	96x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	86x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	52x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	43x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	53x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	40x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $654

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback