HP s5780uk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP s5780uk  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '22 at 21:21
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 59
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 78.7
45% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 191
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 2A9C) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 18 19 22 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 30.1
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 21.9
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
43GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.7 9.8 9.6 8.9 9.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 10.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 9.5
18% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.3
183% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1870EF48E8W1333 FE02FE02 EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F CE80CE80 M378B2873EH1-CH9 CE80CE80 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 1024, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical s5780uk Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP s5780uk

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback