MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '22 at 19:09
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 925
88% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,175
73% 1,175 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Device(7377 150A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.4% Good
Lighting 91.7
Reflection 128
Parallax 78.6
75% 99.3 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 70.9
59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Taisu 120GB 120GB
0GB free
Firmware: Q0111A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 155 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 489
Write 160
Mixed 163
SusWrite 161
53% 243 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 11.7
108% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 62.4
72% 122 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 77%
BW-NV3 512GB
0GB free
Firmware: S1111A0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,403
Write 1,095
Mixed 916
252% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 32.7
220% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 486
445% 687 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 229%
EKV100-120G 120GB
0GB free
Firmware: S0513A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 307 130 30 55 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 433
Write 422
Mixed 345
SusWrite 163
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 31.6
156% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 43.8
85% 163 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 79%
Yeston Extreme 500G 500GB
0GB free
Firmware: S0425A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 258 266 259 260 257 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 377
Mixed 401
SusWrite 292
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 58.1
198% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 114
150% 269 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%
Nvme BW-NV3 512GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,776
Write 1,527
Mixed 1,090
1,089% 1,464 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 236
4K Mixed 34.2
10,559% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 1,056
DQ Mixed 536
6,234% 832 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 KHX3200C16D4/8GX TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.4
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 37.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback