Dell Latitude 7285

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude 7285  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 03TP29
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2880 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '22 at 16:26
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7Y75
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 175
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 247
32% 244 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Dell(1028 07A5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.6
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG20ZMS512G NVM 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ACDA0101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 427 401 410 454 350 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 619
Write 573
Mixed 525
SusWrite 390
118% 527 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 51.7
174% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 564
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 306
245% 355 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 119%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude 7285 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude 7285

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback