HP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18FA
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160726
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '22 at 04:36
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 48
2-Core 94.6
47% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 124
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 2.6
0% 2.33 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 6.6
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 86 99 96 91 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 93.6
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
16GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 31 30 29 29 30 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 106
Write 43.4
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 27.4
74% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.5
101% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback