Panasonic CF-53AAGZX1M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPanasonic CF-53AAGZX1M  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF53-1
Memory13.1 GB free of 16.0078 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 23:07
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 147
59% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 132
23% 164 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB
912GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 389 370 384 355 402 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 393
Write 324
Mixed 324
SusWrite 378
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 10.8
45% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 64
DQ Write 23.5
DQ Mixed 22.6
22% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 56GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 40960 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-53AAGZX1M Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-53AAGZX1M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $34
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback