MSI 760GM -E51 (MS-7596)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7596
MotherboardMSI 760GM -E51 (MS-7596)  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110228
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 29 '17 at 15:27
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 39
2-Core 84.7
45% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 82.6
8-Core 87.3
11% 84.9 Pts
64-Core 84.7
5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
MSI(1462 7501) 256MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.44
0% 0.78 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.78 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 159GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51% Above average
Read 109
Write 69
Mixed 92
68% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.3
83% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51%
Great: 68%
WD My Passport 25F3 256GB
238GB free, PID 25f3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 29.1
Write 27.6
Mixed 26.5
36% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.06
4K Write 3.97
4K Mixed 2.54
240% 3.86 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM -E51 (MS-7596) Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 760GM -E51 (MS-7596)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback