Asrock B365 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B365 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 16:11
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 492
63% 477 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 863B) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 66
51% 64.1 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 59.5
51% 62.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,543
Write 4428
Mixed 5,357
1,346% 6,110 MB/s
4K Read 671
4K Write 293
4K Mixed 384
1,664% 449 MB/s
DQ Read 1,919
DQ Write 1,128
DQ Mixed 1,400
1,076% 1,482 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD WD3200AUDX-73AMG 320GB
130GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 105 105 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 106
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
978GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 173 186 189 191 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 133
Write 179
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 184
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 2OZ 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 11.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365 Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $526
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback