Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 51.5 1-Core 21.6 2-Core 44.6 27% 39.2 Pts	4-Core 88.4 8-Core 83.4 12% 85.9 Pts	64-Core 88.1 6% 88.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1BED) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.1% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 3.5 2% 2.53 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 3.1 2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 877GB free Firmware: 0143 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 37 38 37 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 31.7 Write 36.2 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 37.7 26% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 67%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 494GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 429GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 17 30 27 27 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 120 Write 59.1 Mixed 59.6 SusWrite 34.9 82% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.2 108% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 4GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.5% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9.2 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 0.6 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	1x
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 4GBHynixBench 36%, 202 samples	1x
HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 15%, 2,027 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16