Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX) 41 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 62.7 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 154 55% 97.4 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 504 52% 417 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$500 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	173% Outstanding	Lighting 246 Reflection 218 Parallax 261 201% 242 fps	MRender 286 Gravity 216 Splatting 160 174% 220 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 202%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 161GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 239 240 238 246 246 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 315 Write 282 Mixed 284 SusWrite 237 63% 279 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 19.5 62% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 71.9 95% 181 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x12GB 4,175 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 47.3 MC Write 35.9 MC Mixed 39.8 117% 41 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 17.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

CPU
Core (Haswell, no TSX)IntelBench 61%, 41 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $500Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1x

SSD
Hat VirtIO 161GBRedBench 45%, 47 samples	1x

RAM
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	1x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $500

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16