Lenovo 20251

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20251  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO G700
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130422
Uptime15.6 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 08:07
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 77.6
35% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 125
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 82.1
5% 82.1 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 72 23 71 76 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 417
Write 360
Mixed 352
SusWrite 94
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.9
30% 8.73 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 48.5
47% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 100%
WD My Passport 2626 2TB
503GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 24 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 31
Write 24.2
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 24.1
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
160% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 9.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20251 Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20251

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback