Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 160 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 308 45% 331 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7750 22,655 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Device(1545 7750) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	7.66% Terrible	Lighting 8.8 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 14.4 7% 12.9 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 9.6 Splatting 10.2 9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.66% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 46 47 50 51 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.8% Below average	Read 168 Write 150 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 47.6 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 29.4 62% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 40.5 DQ Mixed 69.3 57% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 16GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 11.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	766x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	325x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	308x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	67x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	61x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	60x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $215