HP 700-074

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-074  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130919
Uptime32.5 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 17:08
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 137
61% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 299
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2AF3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.6
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 146 144 110 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47% Average
Read 37.8
Write 93.6
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 126
52% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
128GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 65 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 78
Write 77.5
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 65.3
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 62%
Sony Storage Media 1GB
0GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.9 4 3.8 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3.9
7% 6.75 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 6%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
46GB free, PID 0918
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 10 8.1 11 7.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 87.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 9.4
24% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
47% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 28%
SDHC Card 32GB
29GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7 2.6 3.1 0.7 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.2
9% 7.95 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-074 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-074

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback