MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220316
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 13:25
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 162
2-Core 321
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 647
8-Core 919
98% 783 Pts
64-Core 1,167
72% 1,167 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 105%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 30.2
18% 25 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 21.6
18% 21.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256GD9TNG-L2A0A 256GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 515 241 206 177 170 180 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,076
Write 327
Mixed 432
SusWrite 248
114% 521 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 45.8
192% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 528
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 404
300% 402 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 134%
Great: 191%
WD WD80EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 203 203 203 202 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 188
Mixed 159
SusWrite 203
141% 191 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
265% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 120%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
0GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 109
Write 109
Mixed 73.2
72% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
2GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 93.4
Mixed 62.8
64% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
1GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 162
Write 172
Mixed 85.8
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
11GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 119 109 100 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 118
Write 110
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 114
67% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
10GB free
Firmware: V5DOA73A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 52.4
Mixed 31
SusWrite 55.4
34% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 35%
ipTIME External 500GB
2GB free, PID 3940
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93.8
Write 94
Mixed 50.5
98% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
10GB free, PID 1f0a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 27.6
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 38.7
45% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 32.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 36.3
111% 39 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback