TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ESC500 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ESC500 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P10S WS
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 12:51
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v6
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 626
63% 510 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 77.9%
 Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 53.7
Parallax 50.1
40% 51.1 fps
MRender 49.1
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 57.3
43% 52.4 fps
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 41.5%
 Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 344 341 164 147 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 418
Write 424
Mixed 371
SusWrite 237
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 40.1
148% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 253
197% 268 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 89.1%
 Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
830GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 164 168 166 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 133
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 166
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 93.7%
 Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 133 132 135 134 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 137
Write 134
Mixed 82
SusWrite 132
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 77.2%
 Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 76.C105G.D100B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 21.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 23.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 76.5%
 Great: 79%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ESC500 G4 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Asus ESC500 G4

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples11x
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples9x
Xeon E3-1230 v6IntelBench 79%, 474 samples4x
GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples5x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples2x
SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples3x
SNV2S500G 500GBKingstonBench 233%, 18,653 samples3x
540s Series 480GBIntelBench 82%, 4,519 samples2x
RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples5x
KHX3200C16D4/8GX Adata DDR4 3600 16GBKingstonBench 75%, 6 samples3x
76.C105G.D100B 2x8GBApacerBench 75%, 9 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback