HP 24-g001la

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP 24-g001la  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81BA
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 17:54
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 122
54% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 192
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 81BA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.6 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 480GB SSD 480GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.0.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 50 32 50 53 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 362
Write 43
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 57
29% 135 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 20.3
92% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 51
DQ Mixed 87.2
70% 102 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C22-8GRS Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 12GB
3200, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.1% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.5
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 17
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 24-g001la Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP 24-g001la

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback