Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5750G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire 5750G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE50_HR
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 16:24
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$55
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 132
57% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 184
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.2% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 56.2
36% 48.7 fps
MRender 43.7
Gravity 43
Splatting 32.6
32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GN003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 31 27 26 35 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 53.5
Write 70.4
Mixed 20
SusWrite 31.8
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 45%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
75GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 74 71 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 64
Write 52.5
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 73.1
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FSFF65F-C8NL9 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5750G Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5750G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback