HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 183E
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 09:25
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 395
47% 361 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 183E) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.933.3.4000
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 3.1
3% 3.1 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 200 199 200 236 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 367
Write 152
Mixed 351
SusWrite 210
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 30.9
102% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 166
155% 237 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MK7575GSX 750GB-$63
341GB free
Firmware: GT00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 81 86 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 86.3
Write 74.3
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 83
46% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 13.1
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback