Gigabyte GA-AERO 15 Classic-XA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15 Classic-XA  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 05:55
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 628
69% 545 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Gigabyte(1458 1664) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3172
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 99.8
Reflection 102
Parallax 102
81% 101 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 92.4
Splatting 87.9
83% 104 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 692 546 562 581 547 557 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,792
Write 1,295
Mixed 640
SusWrite 581
239% 1,077 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 50
178% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 600
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 201
241% 423 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 186%
Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 25.4
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 15 Classic-XA Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15 Classic-XA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 617% - Outstanding Total price: $4
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback