HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 19 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 23:59
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3940XM-$344
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 196
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 496
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 3.3
4% 3.4 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 159 450 167 436 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 390
Write 284
Mixed 308
SusWrite 303
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 22.1
76% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 67.4
129% 257 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-186.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback