Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Memory 27.1 1-Core 4.5 2-Core 8.9 11% 13.5 Pts	4-Core 8.9 8-Core 8.8 1% 8.85 Pts	64-Core 8.6 0% 8.6 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1297 2053) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: N191129a SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 272 70 31 18 30 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.7% Poor	Read 269 Write 26.3 Mixed 52 SusWrite 106 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 8.7 30% 9.27 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 20.9 DQ Mixed 22.5 17% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 78.B2GCZ.9K00C 1x4GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.73 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 1.5 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 272 15% 272 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	6x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	7x

RAM
TI9C5S05H41159 1x4GBUnknownBench 21%, 44 samples	3x
MAGNUMTECH 1x4GBUnknownBench 19%, 210 samples	2x
99U5469-051.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 334 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16