Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150602
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '22 at 10:16
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 78.6 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 158 59% 101 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 276 27% 223 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 2456) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.7% Poor	Lighting 36.1 Reflection 47.3 Parallax 37.9 29% 40.4 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 26.5 27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,859 Write 3,976 Mixed 4,399 914% 4078 MB/s	4K Read 387 4K Write 223 4K Mixed 186 943% 265 MB/s	DQ Read 1,252 DQ Write 742 DQ Mixed 697 600% 897 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 128%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$86 7,846 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 801GB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 159 160 160 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 153 Write 154 Mixed 67.9 SusWrite 158 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	46.7% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 13.9 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	467x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	299x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	305x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	203x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	174x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	140x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	61x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16