Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory118.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 00:00
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 305
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 873
89% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 112
Parallax 116
101% 117 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 105
Splatting 96.6
91% 114 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 999GB
551GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 197 206 166 138 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 548
Write 897
Mixed 952
SusWrite 165
145% 641 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 32.5
152% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 533
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 341
359% 580 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 413%
Amd-raid Array 3 4TB
789GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 210 198 184 176 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 638
Write 684
Mixed 610
SusWrite 183
119% 528 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 29.4
113% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 245
249% 384 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 744%
Amd-raid Array 1 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 65 67 68 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 95.7
Write 102
Mixed 103
SusWrite 67.8
69% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
224% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GVK 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.3% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 29.9
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 32.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 169%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback