Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory	118.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '22 at 23:16
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 741 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 136 56% 93 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 598 55% 459 Pts	64-Core 1,511 94% 1,511 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Gainward(10B0 1E84) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	119% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 152 Parallax 153 127% 154 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 137 Splatting 118 117% 147 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$89 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 348GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 401 391 391 399 401 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 406 Write 421 Mixed 388 SusWrite 398 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 33 107% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 283 215% 292 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 248GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 237 236 237 237 240 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62% Good	Read 248 Write 237 Mixed 232 SusWrite 238 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 36.8 4K Mixed 31 96% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 164 123% 164 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 4TB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 183GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 413 408 409 415 415 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 409 Write 424 Mixed 409 SusWrite 414 94% 414 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 34.3 111% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 304 230% 311 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 110%
Seagate Portable 5TB 3,819 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 71 74 75 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 80.8 Write 111 Mixed 65.4 SusWrite 73.4 61% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 164% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 67%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 14TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 3TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 80 80 83 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	45% Average	Read 116 Write 128 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 81.7 134% 100 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 2.5 203% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 83%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB 1,735 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 769GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 23 22 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 25.3 Mixed 26 SusWrite 22.5 34% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 66%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 73GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 38.4 Write 30.6 Mixed 32 SusWrite 29 43% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.1 198% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	MC Read 53.8 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 31.1 118% 41.2 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.8 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R920 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	5x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	2x
Trion 150 480GBOCZ $300Bench 85%, 13,412 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351U7CFR8A 16x4GBHynixBench 84%, 5 samples	4x
HMT351U7CFR8A 8x4GBHynixBench 85%, 11 samples	2x
36KSF1G72PZ-1 8x8GBMicronBench 89%, 49 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16