Asrock N73V-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock N73V-S  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090922
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 19:38
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 89
49% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 65.7
8-Core 76.1
9% 70.9 Pts
64-Core 80.2
5% 80.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
XFX(1682 2470) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.99% Terrible
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 7.6
11% 10.8 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 7.2
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.99%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ3A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 98 98 101 103 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 119
Write 104
Mixed 110
SusWrite 98.6
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 27.8
96% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 53.6
DQ Mixed 35.2
28% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
194GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 74.8
Write 80.1
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 88.2
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 3.5
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N73V-S Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N73V-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback