Acer Aspire A515-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A515-44  (all builds)
MotherboardRO Calla_RN
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210315
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 16:55
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 710
78% 619 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Acer(1025 1461) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.40
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 20.2
12% 17.4 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 17.1
12% 15 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11000C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 709 670 649 656 660 664 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 993
Write 870
Mixed 835
SusWrite 668
189% 841 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 68.4
231% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 695
533% 718 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 185%
Great: 196%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 32.7
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 19.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-44 Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback