Toshiba Satellite C850-B636

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite C850-B636  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime73.3 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 16:41
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 166
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 429
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500/7600
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 3.5
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 2.3 6.1 7.3 9.6 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Read 3.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 6.1
4% 5.18 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 47%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
424GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 57 63 58 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 33.7
Write 46.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 55.3
55% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C850-B636 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Toshiba Satellite C850-B636

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback