TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Positivo A14CR6A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo A14CR6A  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo A14CR6A
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 14:51
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 117
56% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 144
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 49.8%
 Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1297 2027) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.7%
 Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 56 114 2.7 60 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 370
Write 201
Mixed 291
SusWrite 64.3
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 17.7
76% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 137
126% 189 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 51.3%
 Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 0194 SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 14.1
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 51.5%
 Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A14CR6A Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo A14CR6A

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel  $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples21x
Core i5-3210MIntel  $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples3x
Core i5-3320MIntel  $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples2x
GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples30x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples2x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples2x
SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD  $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples2x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples2x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples2x
RAM
SH564128FH8NZPHSCR 2x4GBSmartBench 42%, 520 samples3x
SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 754 samples2x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback