Gateway DX4370

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemGateway DX4370  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway DX4370
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130318
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 04:54
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3620 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 36.4
2-Core 71.3
39% 58.9 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 139
19% 139 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
Acer(1025 061D) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.981.0.0
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.67 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 383 386 365 397 405 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 432
Write 400
Mixed 400
SusWrite 381
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 24
83% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 230
171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 119%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 33
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 35.1
43% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KDG/2G ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.1
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback