Lenovo 90N9002KMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90N9002KMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 370A
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '22 at 22:13
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 764
74% 609 Pts
64-Core 946
59% 946 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
MSI(1462 3852) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.3% Good
Lighting 78.6
Reflection 77.2
Parallax 74.5
64% 76.8 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 59.5
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 833 840 825 547 521 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,359
Write 2,185
Mixed 1,447
SusWrite 744
376% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 70.8
231% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 633
474% 636 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 240%
Great: 347%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 474 475 478 477 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 472
Mixed 439
SusWrite 476
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 47
154% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 351
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CVF Crucial CT8G4DFS832A.C8FJ 16GB
2933, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 23.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90N9002KMW Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 90N9002KMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback