Lenovo 90AS0002BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90AS0002BR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 07 '22 at 21:48
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440S-$118
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 170
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 313
44% 323 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3098) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.5
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480G 480GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 55 73 30 16 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 334
Write 289
Mixed 265
SusWrite 83.6
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 15.3
84% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 48
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 88.9
82% 120 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
647GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 150 150 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 148
Write 147
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 149
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 109%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
901GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 115 115 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 85
Write 77.5
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 113
112% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH5641G8FH8N6TNSQG 0215 CML8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90AS0002BR Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90AS0002BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback