Asus P6T SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6T SE  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '22 at 19:13
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 140
59% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 342
39% 304 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.6% Very good
Lighting 90.6
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 83
74% 87.6 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 80.9
Splatting 72.1
70% 88.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair CSSD-F160GBP2 180GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 71 67 65 67 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 102
Write 95.3
Mixed 106
SusWrite 70.1
21% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 22.9
83% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 28.5
29% 44.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 50%
Seagate ST2000VM002-9UY166 2TB
2GB free
Firmware: SC01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 129
Write 104
Mixed 53.6
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
2GB free
Firmware: CC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 185
Write 161
Mixed 72.5
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate ST31000525SV 1TB-$155
4GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 109 102 74 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 49.2
Write 59.6
Mixed 50
SusWrite 98.9
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3750330SV 750GB-$101
2GB free
Firmware: SV16
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.6
Write 97
Mixed 52
58% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 58%
WD WD6400AADS-00M2B0 640GB
7GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 62 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 98.9
Write 100
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 61.8
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
638GB free
Firmware: 1AA01106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 71 71 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 51.1
Write 78.8
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 71.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback