Lenovo 90RJ00CTUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90RJ00CTUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3730
Memory2.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 07 '22 at 16:53
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 751
73% 600 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Graphics
Dell(1028 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1086 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.18
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 32
17% 33 fps
MRender 45.2
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 34.7
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 512GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70002P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 330 154 79 248 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 434
Write 437
Mixed 410
SusWrite 233
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 38.4
129% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 321
246% 334 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 109%
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL1 256GB
202GB free
Firmware: 6L1QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1154 1158 1038 186 178 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 1,157
Mixed 1,144
SusWrite 653
244% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 98.4
4K Mixed 53.7
178% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 882
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 808
607% 812 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 187%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 RMUA5190MR86H9F-3200 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 17.6
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90RJ00CTUS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90RJ00CTUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback