Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 07 '22 at 13:39
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 239
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 432
60% 442 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 187
Parallax 182
145% 183 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 178
Splatting 125
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 383 335 339 341 343 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 474
Mixed 394
SusWrite 354
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.3
203% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
101GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 424 430 438 440 443 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 440
Mixed 325
SusWrite 426
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 44.7
166% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 158
167% 278 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
441GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 115 117 116 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 152
Write 147
Mixed 75
SusWrite 116
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CM3X4GB2133C11Y4 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CM3X4GB2133C11Y4 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 22.9
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback