TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30E0004BUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30E0004BUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1046
Memory119.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime15.6 Days
Run DateApr 06 '22 at 15:22
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 71.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 1,076
95% 805 Pts
64-Core 5,447
337% 5,447 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 85.8%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
HP(103C 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 182
Parallax 187
147% 183 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 159
Splatting 150
134% 167 fps
Poor: 122% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1083 669 631 830 715 773 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,540
Write 1,644
Mixed 1455
SusWrite 784
357% 1,606 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 49.3
168% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,073
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 686
567% 823 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 241%
 Great: 269%
Samsung 870 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 204 178 224 193 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 320
Write 280
Mixed 280
SusWrite 212
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 23.6
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 69.7
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 123
95% 126 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 56.4%
 Great: 119%
Samsung 870 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 204 178 224 193 199 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 460
Write 402
Mixed 407
SusWrite 212
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 32.8
112% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 120
97% 133 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 72.3%
 Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE M393A2K43DB3-CWE Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2E1 M393A2K43DB3-CWE M393A2K43DB3-CWE M393A2K43DB3-CWE M393A2K43DB3-CWE M393A2K43DB3-CWE 128GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
178% Outstanding
MC Read 77.3
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 89.6
204% 71.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 39.1
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 30E0004BUK Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Lenovo 30E0004BUK

CPU
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-CoresAMDBench 87%, 460 samples3x
GPU
RTX 3050Nvidia  $250Bench 75%, 43,922 samples1x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples1x
RTX A5000NvidiaBench 166%, 809 samples1x
SSD
MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GBSamsungBench 306%, 4,571 samples2x
Array 1 2TBAmd-raidBench 159%, 26 samples1x
RAM
18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2E1 Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE 64GBMicronBench 175%, 3 samples1x
M393A2K43DB3-CWE M393A2K43DB3-CWE Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2E1 M393A2K43DB3-CWE M393A2K43DB3-CWE M393A2K43DB3-CWE M393A2K43DB3-CWE M393A2K43DB3-CWE 128GBSamsungBench 178%, 1 sample1x
18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2E1 Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE 18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2E1 Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE 128GBMicronBench 243%, 1 sample1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback