Asus PRIME B560-PLUS AC-HES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560-PLUS AC-HES  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 06 '22 at 11:11
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600KF-$178
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 339
109% 202 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 994
99% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,219
75% 1,219 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
PNY(196E 138C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 245
Reflection 224
Parallax 222
200% 230 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 167
Splatting 135
146% 186 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 165%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 371 369 368 371 372 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,862
Write 1,495
Mixed 1,344
SusWrite 441
287% 1,286 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 89.7
335% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,463
DQ Write 1,187
DQ Mixed 1,113
891% 1,255 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 263%
Great: 271%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
903GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1396 534 532 531 532 532 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 1,862
Write 1,935
Mixed 1,566
SusWrite 676
339% 1,510 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 85.8
314% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,780
DQ Write 1,346
DQ Mixed 1,463
1,121% 1,530 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 282%
Great: 300%
JMicron Generic DISK01 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 37.7
Write 32.6
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 30.4
44% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.2
200% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 91%
JMicron Generic DISK02 8TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.25% Terrible
Read 31.8
Write 31.8
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 3.8
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.25%
Great: 80%
JMicron Generic DISK03 8TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.88% Terrible
Read 30.2
Write 30.7
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 0
29% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
43% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-8GTZRX Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-8GTZRX 32GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
115% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 38.9
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 35
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 115%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B560-PLUS AC-HES Builds (Compare 1,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560-PLUS AC-HES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback