Asus PRIME A320M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-F  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateApr 06 '22 at 09:58
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 211
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 628
61% 500 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$234
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.6% Below average
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 111
Parallax 114
0% 75 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 103
Splatting 95.8
90% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X5240G 240GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 57 73 58 60 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 447
Write 311
Mixed 280
SusWrite 74.8
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 22.2
35% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 10.6
61% 135 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$32
243GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 165 144 100 180 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 176
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 157
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-F Builds (Compare 552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback