ADD TO PC
BUILD

Compaq-presario KT526AA-A2L SR5505F

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Compaq-presario KT526AA-A2L SR5505F (all builds)
Motherboard	OEM_MB IVY8
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20080502
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '22 at 00:19
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 61.2 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 85.7 40% 63.4 Pts	4-Core 83.9 8-Core 86.5 11% 85.2 Pts	64-Core 84.3 5% 84.3 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7350 37 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1545 7350) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.7 1% 1.77 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 800 512GB 220 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 438GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 96 99 93 91 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.8% Average	Read 118 Write 99.9 Mixed 108 SusWrite 94.5 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 31.4 98% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 42.7 DQ Write 67.2 DQ Mixed 51.2 40% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 110%
Adata SU 800 512GB 220 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 477GB free Firmware: 02K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 182 182 177 152 188 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.1% Good	Read 213 Write 130 Mixed 192 SusWrite 174 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 38.6 123% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 50.4 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 66.6 53% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 110%
42 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 109GB free, PID 6000 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 27 41 32 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 119 Write 32.3 Mixed 17 SusWrite 34 53% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.6 110% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical KT526AA-A2L SR5505F Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Compaq-presario KT526AA-A2L SR5505F

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+AMDBench 41%, 5,594 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	1x
Radeon HD 7350AMDBench 1%, 37 samples	1x

SSD
SU 800 512GBAdataBench 83%, 220 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback