Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '22 at 20:53
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 776
82% 657 Pts
64-Core 803
50% 803 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
49.1% Average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 78.4
52% 71.4 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 43.6
43% 54.4 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P300 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0214B0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1049 1072 796 635 48 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,471
Write 1100
Mixed 800
SusWrite 628
223% 1,000 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 23.6
165% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 334
329% 509 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 171%
Great: 185%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
53GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 95 93 89 97 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 263
Write 128
Mixed 179
SusWrite 94.3
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 33.7
130% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 87.8
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 94.4
74% 101 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 73%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
6GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 442
Mixed 275
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 48.4
171% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 168
176% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
495GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 194 196 197 197 197 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 195
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
134GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 188 189 190 191 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 122
Write 123
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 190
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 26.3
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 27
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 53.7
74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $297

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback