MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D22
MotherboardMSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '22 at 20:02
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 223
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 712
72% 583 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.32
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 83.4
Parallax 91.6
84% 92.6 fps
MRender 82
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 62.8
58% 72.1 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M390 500GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFM31.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1192 2184 2192 1071 139 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,205
Write 2,197
Mixed 1,233
SusWrite 1,153
328% 1447 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 56
200% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,170
DQ Write 803
DQ Mixed 956
722% 976 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 224%
Great: 321%
Kingdian S280-240GB 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: P0414B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 238 77 77 77 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 488
Write 346
Mixed 337
SusWrite 152
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 40.5
136% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 224
183% 259 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22) Builds (Compare 8,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback