ECS IC41T-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardECS IC41T-A  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 05 '22 at 19:05
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 89.6
46% 71 Pts
4-Core 75.7
8-Core 82.7
10% 79.2 Pts
64-Core 92.4
6% 92.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.3% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 0.3
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 0.6
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.3%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
798GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 54 46 89 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 76.4
Write 113
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 73.5
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IC41T-A Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS IC41T-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback