Acer Aspire 5250

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 5250  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer HMA51-BZ
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '22 at 03:58
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-50
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Memory 26.9
1-Core 10.3
2-Core 15.9
13% 17.7 Pts
4-Core 9.6
8-Core 13.9
2% 11.8 Pts
64-Core 12.3
1% 12.3 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250
Acer(1025 0602) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.24% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.24%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 50 37 38 36 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 45.4
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 41.5
32% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27%
Great: 47%
AI Mass Storage 32GB
30GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 10 9.8 9.5 6.1 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 16.3
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 9
18% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Elpida EBJ20UF8BCS0-DJ-F 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
8.43% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 0.5
SC Mixed 2.1
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 274
15% 274 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.43%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5250 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback