Lenovo 43516F9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 43516F9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 21:50
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 470
55% 426 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
MSI(1462 809E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.7% Average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 60.2
Parallax 75.4
41% 61.9 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 44
43% 53.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 449 431 451 470 472 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 428
Mixed 411
SusWrite 454
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 42.4
153% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 364
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 110%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 214 218 219 219 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 145
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 215
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 109%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8C 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 23.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 43516F9 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 43516F9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback