Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3710 12,685 User benchmarks, average bench 25% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Memory 50.8 1-Core 24 2-Core 48 28% 40.9 Pts	4-Core 95.5 8-Core 95.4 13% 95.4 Pts	64-Core 94.2 6% 94.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1D05 1012) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 3.5 2% 3.03 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$31 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMP1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 59 60 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 466 Write 59.7 Mixed 102 SusWrite 59 37% 172 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 7.9 55% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-055.A00LF 1x4GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.8% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 6.3 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 3.7 12% 4 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	7x
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	5x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	11x
HD Graphics (PHDGD Skylake v2.9)IntelBench 2%, 8 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 120GBGigabyte $31Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
99U5469-055.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 21%, 121 samples	6x
GKH400SO51208-1600 1x4GBUnknownBench 19%, 336 samples	4x
99U5469-045.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 1,714 samples	2x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $31

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16