Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 186 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 361 48% 359 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670 3,465 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B 7670) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1002 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	5.48% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 7.7 Parallax 5.8 6% 6.83 fps	MRender 7.3 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 6 5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.48% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 110 78 43 25 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 312 Write 258 Mixed 243 SusWrite 65.1 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 26 100% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 160 138% 199 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 87%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 108GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 46 138 47 157 186 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.1% Poor	Read 123 Write 83.7 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 134 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 9.4 37% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 15 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 14.3 11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 100%
MD05000-AJDW-RO 500GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 103GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 60 60 61 60 58 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 69.3 Write 71.1 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 58.5 46% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	453x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	396x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	80x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278