Casper NIRVANA NB C600 SILVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB C600 SILVER  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER C600 002
Memory16.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 13:38
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 92.7
47% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 172
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Quanta(152D 1137) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 6.3
5% 4.97 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.6
5% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA18.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 285 164 192 215 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.6% Below average
Read 170
Write 102
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 221
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 8
35% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 37.5
22% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB4GS2400.C8FT 029E CMSX16GX4M1A2400C16 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.2% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 8.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NB C600 SILVER Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB C600 SILVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback